Arriving in South Africa yesterday, I was reminded of what British heritage leaves around – driving on the left, spelling key as quay, and televising every world cricket match. One day I’ll understand that sport. You also can’t escape the reality of global branding from the moment you exit the plane – the ubiquitous HSBC jet bridges, Visa adverts plastering baggage claim, and a Coca-Cola vending machine in every corner.
There’s also this large sporting event coming up (in case you haven’t heard): the 2010 FIFA World Cup. Or rather, “the-every-fourth-year-global-football-tournament-to-determine-a-single-country-champion,” as FIFA would like me to refer to it in this space.
FIFA is playing brand police here in South Africa, and a ruthless outfit at that. You can find just a taste of their efforts in this article. My personal favorite – their request of Kalula, one of South Africa’s low-cost airlines, to withdraw its slogan “Unofficial National Carrier of the You-Know-What.” While fully understanding that FIFA and its corporate partners paid truckloads of money for brand exclusivity at the tournament, the brand management tenacity at play here seems to far exceed rational boundaries.
When you’re shutting down a street vendor for selling a scarf with the words World Cup on it, it seems a bit beyond the pale – especially here in South Africa, where the World Cup may be the lifeline to a better livelihood for that precise street vendor.
FIFA is even removing any brand mark from legitimate products sold in stadiums that are not linked to its corporate sponsors. FIFA’s marketing director Thierry Weil said this: “The restriction is, it must be unbranded, but you will still make money, so this unbranded one is not harming anyone.” By his stated logic, this is facially absurd. FIFA clearly believes that brand is paramount to financial success (as do we here at MLC), hence the restrictions on those brands not associated with it. The brand removal must be at least somewhat harmful if protecting even the omnipresent name World Cup proves so important.
Perhaps I’m going overboard and am blinded by the incredible hospitality the South Africans have shown on my trip thus far. I’d love to hear what our members think on this topic. Certainly, my colleagues in our Communications Executive Council have produced much research on the importance of reputation management; I would never argue with the merits of brand standards and guidelines produced by marketing.
Yet something about this example strikes me as going one step too far, taking brand management far beyond its intended purpose. It isn’t as if the public doesn’t know the World Cup brands. Official credit card: Visa (thank you Morgan Freeman). Official soft drink: Coca Cola. Official restaurant: McDonald’s. And now we have an official brand police officer – FIFA. To invert McDonald’s line, I’m not lovin’ it. But wait, am I allowed to write that?
Related posts:
on 13 May 10
Respond
I totally agree that it’s overboard, much like the NFL Super Bowl brand around here.
But I have to say that I much prefer the FIFA approach to the sport and game than any game in the US. Here, every game is filled with breaks and distractions to add spaces for ads/commercials which takes a lot out of the sport itself. I’m biased towards football (soccer) since I love it, and, perhaps, it’s a missed marketing opportunity for FIFA but I do enjoy not having to hit the FF button of my DVR every few minutes.
on 13 May 10
Respond
FIFA’s approach is zealous, perhaps, but probably is not out of the ordinary for an event as expensive to stage as a World Cup. I remember reading how, before the 1996 Olympics, the Atlanta Committee for the Olympic Games somehow forced a local greek restaurant – the Olympic Cafe – to change its name, even though its existence predated anyone’s proposing that Atlanta host the games.