<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Being Unique Only Gets You So Far</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mlcwideangle.exbdblogs.com/2009/12/01/being-unique-only-gets-you-so-far/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mlcwideangle.exbdblogs.com/2009/12/01/being-unique-only-gets-you-so-far/</link>
	<description>Broaden Your Perspective with the Marketing Leadership Council</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 22:58:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Whitney Satin</title>
		<link>http://mlcwideangle.exbdblogs.com/2009/12/01/being-unique-only-gets-you-so-far/comment-page-1/#comment-86</link>
		<dc:creator>Whitney Satin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 19:52:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mlcwideangle.exbdblogs.com/?p=535#comment-86</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-80&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@Gulam Razzak &lt;/a&gt; 

We&#039;re definitely on the same page here.  We found that benefits fall into one of two categories: some are &quot;common&quot;, or, the types of benefits you&#039;d want out of any commercial relationship regardless of industry.  Here we include things like reliability, trustworthiness, or adapting to meet specific customer needs.  To your point, excellent execution of these &quot;basics&quot; is critical for getting a customer to consider a company in the first place.   But when we looked at companies with the highest levels of loyalty, they weren&#039;t stopping at the basics ... they ALSO provided a benefit that was distinct to their specific company.  This is where &quot;unique benefits&quot; come into play.  Highly preferred companies focus on delivering one or two benefits that the competition isn&#039;t going after while performing strongly on a few common benefits as well.  Check out my earlier post on this here: http://mlcwideangle.exbdblogs.com/2009/11/03/deliver-unique-benefits-and-customers-will-follow/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-80" rel="nofollow">@Gulam Razzak </a> </p>
<p>We&#8217;re definitely on the same page here.  We found that benefits fall into one of two categories: some are &#8220;common&#8221;, or, the types of benefits you&#8217;d want out of any commercial relationship regardless of industry.  Here we include things like reliability, trustworthiness, or adapting to meet specific customer needs.  To your point, excellent execution of these &#8220;basics&#8221; is critical for getting a customer to consider a company in the first place.   But when we looked at companies with the highest levels of loyalty, they weren&#8217;t stopping at the basics &#8230; they ALSO provided a benefit that was distinct to their specific company.  This is where &#8220;unique benefits&#8221; come into play.  Highly preferred companies focus on delivering one or two benefits that the competition isn&#8217;t going after while performing strongly on a few common benefits as well.  Check out my earlier post on this here: <a href="http://mlcwideangle.exbdblogs.com/2009/11/03/deliver-unique-benefits-and-customers-will-follow/" rel="nofollow">http://mlcwideangle.exbdblogs.com/2009/11/03/deliver-unique-benefits-and-customers-will-follow/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gulam Razzak</title>
		<link>http://mlcwideangle.exbdblogs.com/2009/12/01/being-unique-only-gets-you-so-far/comment-page-1/#comment-80</link>
		<dc:creator>Gulam Razzak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 18:40:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mlcwideangle.exbdblogs.com/?p=535#comment-80</guid>
		<description>I think the term &#039;Unique Benefits&#039; might be mis-leading. As the research shows, many companies fail when it comes to actually delivering the benefit, whatever it may be. Our learning has shown that the benefit may not be necessarily unique (or totally different from that being offered by competition) but what makes the difference is consistent and high quality execution of your basics. I think the key is to get your basics executed really well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the term &#8216;Unique Benefits&#8217; might be mis-leading. As the research shows, many companies fail when it comes to actually delivering the benefit, whatever it may be. Our learning has shown that the benefit may not be necessarily unique (or totally different from that being offered by competition) but what makes the difference is consistent and high quality execution of your basics. I think the key is to get your basics executed really well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
